The Channel Attribution page is the main attribution dashboard. Open it from Insights → Attribution.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.getinteract.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Selecting a date window
Use the date range picker at the top of the page to set the analysis window. Only customer journeys that started within this window are included. Quick presets are available for common windows:| Preset | Typical use |
|---|---|
| Last 30 days | Recent performance, fast to compute |
| Last 90 days | Standard operational window |
| Last 180 days | Longer-term patterns |
| Last 365 days | Full-year analysis |
Label filters
If label splits are configured in your attribution settings, a multi-select filter appears next to the date picker. Select one or more segment values (e.g.NL, DE) to view attribution for that combination.
When multiple labels are selected, each label is modelled independently and results are shown separately or aggregated — depending on the visualisation.
Dashboard sections
Channel removal effects
The removal effect chart shows the Markov model’s primary output: how much conversion rate drops when each channel is removed from all journeys.- A tall bar means the channel is structurally important — many journeys rely on it
- A short bar means journeys frequently convert even without this channel
- Channels not appearing in any journey during the window show zero removal effect
Attributed revenue
The attributed revenue chart distributes total journey revenue across channels according to the credit share from each model.- Markov credit is based on removal effects (re-normalised to sum to 100%)
- Shapley credit is based on cooperative game-theory coalition values (only shown when Shapley is enabled)
- Last-touch is shown as a reference baseline
Journey flow (Sankey)
The Sankey chart visualises the most common customer journey paths as a flow from first touchpoint to conversion or dropout.- Node width is proportional to the number of journeys passing through that channel
- Link width is proportional to flow volume between two channels
- Journeys that do not convert flow to a “No conversion” terminal node
Coverage and quality indicators
Two metric indicators appear alongside the charts:| Indicator | What it means |
|---|---|
| Coverage | Percentage of journeys where at least one touchpoint matched a known channel. Low coverage (below ~80%) suggests many journeys contain channel values not in your configured channel list — check for naming inconsistencies. |
| Single-step journeys | Percentage of journeys with only one touchpoint. Very high values (above ~60%) can affect Markov model quality, as there are fewer multi-channel paths to learn transition probabilities from. |
Model comparison
Both Markov and Shapley results are shown side-by-side when Shapley is enabled. Key differences:| Markov | Shapley | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Removal effect from transition matrix | Marginal contribution across all channel orderings |
| Sensitivity to order | High — channel position matters | Low — all orderings are considered equally |
| Handles synergies | Partially | Yes |
| Computation speed | Fast | Slower (exponential with channel count) |
| Best for | Operational decisions, regular runs | Deep analysis, model validation |
Next steps
Journey Attribution
Drill into per-touchpoint credit at the individual journey level.
Attribution setup
Configure the paths table, models, spend data, and scheduling.